1983 Lincoln Cent Errors: Value Guide & Rare Varieties

Is your 1983 penny worth money? Discover the $29,250 bronze planchet transitional error, the FS-801 Doubled Die Reverse worth up to $7,050, and how to avoid worthless plating blisters. Updated January 2026.

Quick Answer

Most 1983 pennies are worth face value — but this year hosts two legendary errors: a bronze planchet transitional error worth up to $29,250, and a Doubled Die Reverse (FS-801) worth up to $7,050.

  • ⚖️ Bronze Planchet Error (The Holy Grail): Coin weighs 3.11g instead of 2.5g — worth $15,000–$29,250+
  • 🔍 Doubled Die Reverse FS-801: Bold rounding and separation on ONE CENT & E PLURIBUS UNUM — worth $150–$7,050
  • 💎 1983-S Proof: Worth $3–$10 in standard grades
  • 🏭 Uncirculated P or D: Worth $0.20–$1.00 in typical grades

⚠️ Biggest trap: Plating blisters and zinc rot are ubiquitous on 1983 cents and add zero numismatic value — don't be fooled by bubbling or corrosion on the surface.

1983 Lincoln Cent Errors Error Checker

Check your coin for valuable errors and varieties

Values shown are typical retail estimates as of 2026-01 and include verified auction records through July 2024.

Error coin values vary significantly based on grade, eye appeal, color designation, and market conditions.

Professional authentication (PCGS/NGC) is strongly recommended for high-value varieties, especially the bronze planchet error.

The 1983 Bronze Planchet Error requires a 0.01g precision digital scale for authentication — visual identification alone is unreliable.

Machine Doubling (flat, shelf-like) is NOT a valuable error variety and is extremely common on 1983 cents.

Plating blisters and zinc rot are common manufacturing defects on 1983 copper-plated zinc cents, not valuable errors.

The 1983 Lincoln Cent looks like any ordinary penny — and for the vast majority of examples, that is exactly what it is. But this date has earned legendary status in numismatics (the study and collection of coins) because it quietly harbors two extraordinary errors born from the year the U.S. Mint switched penny materials: a rare bronze relic worth up to $29,250, and a Doubled Die Reverse bold enough to spot without a magnifying glass. Before you spend that 1983 penny, invest two minutes in this guide. See the complete 1983 Lincoln Cent value guide →

1983 Lincoln Cent: Specifications & Mintage

SpecificationDetail
SeriesLincoln Memorial Cent
CompositionCopper-Plated Zinc (99.2% zinc core, 0.8% copper plating)
Standard Weight2.50g (tolerance ±0.10g) — Alert: 3.0g or more signals a possible bronze planchet error!
Diameter19.00mm
EdgePlain
Philadelphia Mintage7,752,355,000 (business strike)
Denver Mintage6,467,199,428 (business strike)
San Francisco Mintage3,279,126 (Proof only — no business strikes were made)

ℹ️ Why 1983 Is a Special Date

1983 was the first full year of copper-plated zinc cent production after the U.S. Mint phased out the old 95% copper (commonly called bronze) planchet in 1982. The reason: rising copper prices meant the cost of making a penny was approaching one cent itself. The new zinc composition introduced widespread plating instability — bubbles and corrosion known as plating blisters — that confuse collectors to this day. More importantly, a tiny number of leftover bronze planchets from 1982 were accidentally fed into 1983 presses, creating the ultra-rare Transitional Bronze Planchet Error. The old bronze planchet weighed 3.11g; the new zinc planchet weighs 2.50g — a difference a precise digital scale can detect instantly.

Standard 1983 Lincoln Cent on copper-plated zinc showing typical streaky luster

A standard 1983 Lincoln Cent on copper-plated zinc — note the streaky luster typical of the era's zinc planchets.

Required tools: Digital scale (0.01g precision), 10x loupe, magnet. Full baseline value guide →

1983 Penny Quick Checks: Do You Have a Valuable Error?

Run through these three checks in order. The first two can reveal coins worth thousands of dollars; the third is the most common trap that fools new collectors.

Check 1: The Holy Grail — Bronze Planchet Transitional Error

Where to Look

The entire coin — this error is defined by its weight, not its appearance. Place the coin on a digital scale that measures to 0.01g precision. A standard kitchen scale (1g precision) cannot reliably distinguish 2.5g from 3.1g and must not be used.

What Counts

A reading of 3.11g (acceptable range: 3.0g–3.2g). The coin may show a warmer chocolate-brown or bright copper-red color, but weight is the only reliable non-destructive test. It must also be non-magnetic.

What It's NOT

A standard 2.5g zinc cent with heavy plating blisters (looks unusual but weighs the same). A gold-plated or zinc-plated novelty coin from a school science experiment (also weighs ~2.5g). Any post-mint alteration.

💰 If positive:$15,000–$29,250+ | See detailed guide →
Two digital scales showing 1983 cent at 2.50g versus 3.11g bronze planchet error

Left: Standard 1983 zinc cent at 2.50g. Right: Bronze planchet error at 3.11g — a 0.6g difference a precise scale reveals instantly.

Check 2: The Major Variety — 1983 Doubled Die Reverse (FS-801)

Where to Look

The reverse (back) of the coin — specifically the inscriptions E PLURIBUS UNUM, ONE CENT, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Use a 10x loupe (a small jeweler's magnifying glass).

What Counts

Strong, rounded doubling that makes the letters visibly wider than normal. Distinct separation lines between the original letter and its doubled image, with split serifs (the decorative strokes at letter ends). This doubling is visible to the naked eye — you do not need magnification to spot it.

What It's NOT

Machine Doubling (MD) — a very common defect on 1983 cents where the doubling is flat and shelf-like, as if the metal was slid sideways. MD actually narrows the letters; the FS-801 widens them. Plating blisters on letters look like irregular bubbles, not uniform doubling.

💰 If positive:$150–$7,050 | See detailed guide →

Check 3: The Modern Trap — Plating Blisters & Zinc Rot

Where to Look

Anywhere on the coin — flat field areas, near the D mint mark, or on Lincoln's bust on the front.

What You're Seeing

Small to large bubbles (sometimes linear or worm-like) that may be hollow or crushed. Dark grey or black corrosion spots where the copper plating has split, exposing the reactive zinc core.

Why It's Worthless

These are normal manufacturing defects on copper-plated zinc cents. Gas trapped between the zinc core and copper plating during striking creates blisters. They are NOT a Cud (die break at the rim), NOT a Doubled Die, and NOT a Repunched Mint Mark — even when they appear directly on or near letters and mint marks.

⚠️ Result:Face value only. See Traps section →

1983 Lincoln Cent: Error Values at a Glance

Error TypeDesignationMintRarityValue RangeAuction Record
Bronze Planchet ErrorPCGS/NGC VerifiedPUltra Rare$15,000–$29,250+$29,250 (MS65RD, 2024)
Bronze Planchet ErrorPCGS/NGC VerifiedDUltra Rare (<5 known)Est. $15,000+$17,625 (Stack's 2017)
Doubled Die Reverse (DDR)FS-801PScarce$150–$7,050$7,050 (MS68RD, 2017)
Doubled Die Obverse (DDO)WDDO-001DRareEst. $125 (MS65)
Doubled Die Obverse (DDO)WDDO-002DVery RareEst. ~$125 (MS65)
BroadstrikeP / DUncommon$20–$70$70 (Stack's 2017)
Off-Center Strike (10%–30%)P / DUncommon$20–$50
Off-Center Strike (30%–60%, date visible)P / DUncommon$50–$100+
Minor Clipped Planchet (<5%)P / DUncommon$3–$10
Major Clipped Planchet (>15%)P / DUncommon$15–$30
1983-S ProofDCAMSCommon$3–$10 (PR69)

Values reflect Mint State or near-Mint State condition unless noted. Circulated examples trade for significantly less. Off-center values require date to be visible for year attribution. Pricing as of January 2026.

1983 Lincoln Cent Jackpots: Valuable Errors & Varieties

1983 Bronze Planchet Transitional Error

Category: Planchet Error (Wrong Metal)
Value: $15,000+ (AU) | $23,000+ (MS62) | $29,250 (MS65RD record)
Ultra Rare — Handful Known
Side-by-side of standard 1983 zinc cent and 1983 bronze planchet error showing color difference

Left: Standard 1983 zinc cent with typical streaky luster. Right: Bronze planchet error with warmer, chocolate-brown tone. Weight is the definitive test.

Origin & Background

This error is the modern equivalent of the famous 1943 Copper Cent. When the U.S. Mint retooled for the new zinc planchet in 1983, a small number of old 95%-copper bronze planchets from 1982 remained lodged in the tote bins and hopper equipment used to feed presses. These leftover planchets were subsequently dislodged and struck by 1983-dated dies, producing coins that look like ordinary 1983 cents but are chemically and physically identical to pre-1982 bronze issues. The survival estimate is a mere handful of examples for Philadelphia and fewer than five known for Denver, making this one of the rarest modern U.S. coins by population.

How to Identify

  • Weight (definitive): The coin must weigh 3.11g, with a manufacturing tolerance of 2.98g–3.24g. A 0.01g-precision digital scale is required — a kitchen scale is insufficient.
  • Non-magnetic: Verify with a magnet. Bronze cents (and zinc cents) are not attracted to a magnet. This screens out steel counterfeits.
  • Color (supporting, not definitive): Bronze errors often show a warmer, more uniform chocolate-brown or bright copper-red tone compared to the streaky or blistered appearance typical of 1983 zinc cents. Visual identification alone is unreliable.

False Positives to Avoid

The most common false positive is a standard 2.5g zinc cent that has been gold-plated or chemically treated (common in school science experiments). These weigh 2.5g and appear coppery or golden — weigh the coin first and ignore color entirely. Post-mint alterations (PMD) where the coin has been cleaned, plated, or coated will always betray themselves on a precise scale. Never rely on color alone.

Market Values & Trajectory

  • 📅 2013 (Discovery Sale):$23,500MS62RB, Heritage Auctions. Established this as a five-figure rarity.
  • 📅 2014–2020: Examples traded in the $16,000–$22,000 range depending on grade and color designation.
  • 📅 2024 (Record):$29,250MS65RD (finest known), GreatCollections. The Red color designation commands a substantial premium.
  • 📅 1983-D Example:$17,625 — Stack's 2017.

Auction Record

$29,250 for MS65RD (Numismatic News coverage; CoinWeek auction preview; GreatCollections, 2024). Prior record: $23,500 for the discovery coin (MS62RB, Heritage Auctions, 2013).

⚠️ Do Not Submit Without Weighing

Professional grading services (PCGS and NGC) charge submission fees. Do not submit a 1983 cent unless it weighs 3.0g or more on a 0.01g-precision scale AND is non-magnetic. A standard-weight coin will come back as a normal cent and the fees are non-refundable.

1983 Doubled Die Reverse (FS-801 / FS-1c-036)

Category: Die Variety — Philadelphia Only
Value: $150–$300 (MS63–65) | $2,500+ (MS68) | $7,050 (MS68RD record)
Scarce — Market Active
Normal 1983 cent reverse versus FS-801 DDR showing bold letter widening on ONE CENT

Normal 1983 reverse (left) vs. FS-801 DDR (right) — notice the visibly wider, separated letters in ONE CENT and E PLURIBUS UNUM.

Origin & Background

A Doubled Die Reverse (DDR) occurs during the die-manufacturing process. In 1983, dies were made by pressing a hub (the master positive image) into a blank die multiple times — called the multiple-squeeze hubbing method. If the hub and the die were not perfectly realigned between squeezes, the die received a slightly rotated or shifted second impression of the design. Every coin struck by that die then showed the doubling. The FS-801 is considered one of the strongest doubled dies in the Lincoln cent series since 1972, with doubling so bold it is visible to the naked eye.

How to Identify

  • E PLURIBUS UNUM: Clear spread visible on all letters; the motto appears noticeably thicker than normal.
  • ONE CENT: Distinct notching and separation at the corners of each letter. The letters appear wider, with split serifs (doubled decorative strokes at letter ends).
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: Strong separation visible, particularly on the S letters and OF.
  • Stage A Die Marker: Triangle- or arrow-shaped die scratches in the field area north of the word LIBERTY on the obverse (front). These are confirming markers of this specific die.
  • Stage B Die Marker: A die crack extending from the rim below the FG designer's initials into the base of the Memorial building on the reverse. This appears on later-state coins.
Extreme close-up of ONE CENT on FS-801 DDR showing split serifs and widened letters

Close-up of ONE CENT on the FS-801 DDR, showing characteristic letter widening and notched serifs versus a normal coin.

FS-801 Stage A die scratch markers north of LIBERTY and Stage B die crack below FG initials

FS-801 Stage A obverse die scratches (arrows, north of LIBERTY) and Stage B reverse die crack (below FG initials).

False Positives to Avoid

Machine Doubling (MD) is extremely common on 1983 cents due to loose press mechanics of the era. MD looks flat and shelf-like — the metal appears slid sideways, and the doubling actually reduces the letter width. The FS-801 doubling is rounded and notched, and it increases letter width. Die Deterioration Doubling (DDD) produces mushy, indistinct outlines — these are not variety coins either. Plating blisters on letters produce irregular bubbles, not the uniform doubling pattern of the FS-801.

Market Values

  • 🔹 MS63–MS65: $150–$300 — accessible range for advanced collectors.
  • 🔹 MS68: $2,500+ — exceptionally scarce due to the poor planchet quality of 1983 zinc cents (blisters, spotting).

Auction Record

$7,050 for MS68RD (PCGS Auction Prices, Heritage Auctions 2017). The PCGS CoinFacts page for this variety documents the full population and price history.

1983-D Doubled Die Obverse Varieties (WDDO-001 & WDDO-002)

Category: Die Variety — Denver Only
Value: Est. $50–$125 (MS65)
Rare — Limited Auction Data
Normal 1983-D obverse versus WDDO-001 showing clockwise date and LIBERTY doubling

Normal 1983-D obverse (left) vs. WDDO-001 (right) — clockwise spread visible on the date digits and LIBERTY.

Origin & Background

The Denver Mint also produced doubled die obverse varieties in 1983, though these are far less famous than the Philadelphia DDR. They are attributed by Wexler's Coins and Die Varieties and trade infrequently compared to the FS-801.

How to Identify

  • WDDO-001: A clockwise spread on the date digits and LIBERTY on the obverse (front). A die scratch near the 9 in the date is a confirming die marker. Doubling requires a loupe or microscope to confirm reliably.
  • WDDO-002: Features a doubled Lincoln ear, somewhat similar in concept to the famous 1984 Doubled Ear but less pronounced. Look for a secondary earlobe image.

False Positives to Avoid

Machine Doubling and die deterioration doubling are extremely common on Denver cents of this era. The 1984 Doubled Ear is a completely different coin. Plating blisters near letters are not doubling. These Denver DDO varieties require careful die-marker confirmation rather than simple visual inspection.

Market Context

Verified auction data from major houses (Heritage Auctions, Stack's Bowers) is sparse for these varieties. Most market activity occurs in specialized variety dealer channels. Values are estimated at approximately $50–$125 for Mint State examples — treat these as speculative compared to the investment-grade FS-801 and Bronze Planchet Error.

1983 Penny Traps: Common Mistakes to Avoid

The 1983 cent is the most trap-prone modern penny in circulation. The new zinc composition created defects that look alarming but are completely normal. Here are the three you are most likely to encounter.

⚠️ Trap 1: Plating Blisters & Zinc Rot

What You See:

Bubbles (smooth, rounded, sometimes linear or worm-like) on the coin surface. Hollow or crushed bumps. Dark grey or black corrosion spots where the plating has split open, exposing the zinc core.

Why It Happens:

The early barrel-plating process for zinc planchets often trapped gas between the zinc core and copper plating. Heat and pressure during striking caused this gas to expand, pushing the thin copper layer outward. Separately, when the plating is breached, oxygen reacts with zinc to form corrosion that takes up more volume, pushing the plating up further.

How to Tell It's NOT Valuable:
  • Press gently on the bubble with a non-marring tool — a hollow blister may depress slightly. A genuine die error is solid metal and cannot be depressed.
  • Die errors repeat identically on every coin struck by that die. Blisters are random and unique to each coin.
  • Blisters near the D mint mark are extremely common and are not Repunched Mint Marks.

Value: Face value only.

⚠️ Trap 2: Machine Doubling vs. Hub Doubling

What You See:

A doubled or shadowed appearance on letters, the date, or Lincoln's portrait. Appears to show two versions of the same design element side by side.

Why It Happens:

Loose press mechanics caused the die to bounce or skid slightly at the end of the coin strike, smearing the impression sideways. This is called Machine Doubling (MD) or Strike Doubling. It is extremely common on 1983 cents and is classified as damage, not a variety.

How to Tell It's NOT Valuable:
  • Machine Doubling looks flat and shelf-like — the doubled image has no depth and appears to be a smear.
  • MD reduces the width of letters and devices (the space between the main image and its shadow is thin and flat).
  • Genuine hub doubling (like the FS-801) adds rounded width to letters with clear separation and split serifs.

Value: Face value only.

Machine doubling flat shelf-like versus FS-801 hub doubling rounded on 1983 cent lettering

Machine Doubling (left) — flat, shelf-like, narrows letters. Hub Doubling like FS-801 (right) — rounded, widened letters with distinct separation.

⚠️ Trap 3: Gold or Silver 1983 Pennies

What You See:

A 1983 penny that appears silver-coloured (zinc-plated) or gold-coloured (brass, created by heating a zinc-plated coin). Often found in collections of novelty coins.

Why It Happens:

A classic secondary school science experiment involves plating a 1983 penny with zinc (giving a silver appearance) and then heating it to diffuse the zinc into the copper plating, producing a brass (golden) finish. These are Post-Mint Damage (PMD) — alterations made after the coin left the Mint.

How to Tell It's NOT Valuable:
  • Weigh the coin. If it reads approximately 2.5g, it is a standard zinc cent regardless of color.
  • A genuine wrong-planchet error struck on a different denomination's planchet would be significantly different in size and weight.
  • The color on novelty coins is usually uniform and artificial-looking.

Value: Face value only.

Close-up of plating blister on 1983 penny field showing rounded hollow bubble versus solid die error

Typical 1983 cent plating blister — smooth, rounded bubble on the field. This is a manufacturing defect, not a mint error, and adds no value.

1983 Lincoln Cent Grading: How Condition Affects Value

Coin grades run from 1 (barely identifiable) to 70 (perfect). For 1983 Lincoln Cents, grade matters most for the FS-801 DDR: an MS65 example is worth roughly $150–$300, while an MS68 example recently sold for $7,050 — a 20x multiplier for three grade points. Here is why:

  • Zinc planchet quality is poor: The 1983 copper-plated zinc planchets were prone to plating blisters, spotting, and surface haze from the moment they were struck. Finding a 1983 cent with pristine, blast-white surfaces in MS67 or higher is genuinely difficult — hence the enormous premium for top-pop coins.
  • Color designation matters: Red (RD), Red-Brown (RB), and Brown (BN) are the three color categories for copper-series cents. Red commands the highest premium. The record-breaking $29,250 bronze planchet error was MS65 Red; brown examples of the same coin would sell for considerably less.
  • For circulated coins: The FS-801 DDR retains some premium even in circulated grades, but the focus of the collector market is clearly on Mint State examples. The Bronze Planchet Error is valuable regardless of grade — even an AU example is worth $15,000+.

1983 Lincoln Cent Authentication & Professional Grading

Professional authentication by PCGS (Professional Coin Grading Service) or NGC (Numismatic Guaranty Company) is essential before any significant transaction involving 1983 cent errors. Here is when to act and when to skip the submission fee.

⚠️ Stop — DO NOT Submit If:

  • The coin weighs 2.4g–2.6g (it is a normal zinc cent regardless of unusual surface textures).
  • The doubling on the reverse is flat and shelf-like (Machine Doubling — not a variety).
  • The coin has bubbles or blisters that can be depressed with light pressure (Plating Blisters).
  • The coin has dark spots or corrosion near the mint mark (Zinc Rot).
  • The coin appears gold or silver but weighs ~2.5g (Post-Mint Alteration / science experiment coin).

✅ Go — Consider Professional Grading If:

  • The coin weighs 3.0g–3.2g AND is non-magnetic → High probability of Transitional Bronze Planchet Error. Do not clean it. Handle it by the edges only. Submit immediately.
  • The reverse lettering shows strong, rounded doubling with split serifs matching the FS-801 diagnostics, including Stage A or Stage B die markers.

For the Bronze Planchet Error specifically, authentication is non-negotiable: unverified examples have no established market because buyers cannot trust the identification without a holder from PCGS or NGC. The submission fee is trivial relative to the potential value of a genuine example.

Dealer referrals and submission center locations: contact PCGS or NGC directly for authorized dealer networks. Information will be updated as available.

1983 Lincoln Cent: Frequently Asked Questions

How do I know if my 1983 penny is made of bronze (not zinc)?

Weigh it on a digital scale with 0.01g precision. A standard zinc cent weighs 2.50g. A bronze planchet error weighs 3.11g (acceptable range: 2.98g–3.24g). Color can be a supporting clue (bronze errors often show warmer, more uniform tones), but weight is the only reliable non-destructive test. Also verify the coin is non-magnetic.

What is the 1983 Doubled Die Reverse (FS-801) and where is the doubling?

The FS-801 is a Philadelphia Mint variety where the die received two slightly misaligned hub impressions during manufacturing, creating visible doubling on the reverse (back) of the coin. Look for strong, rounded widening of the letters in E PLURIBUS UNUM, ONE CENT, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The doubling is visible to the naked eye — letters appear noticeably wider with split serifs (doubled decorative strokes at letter ends).

Why does my 1983 penny have bubbles on it? Is it valuable?

Almost certainly not. Plating blisters are extremely common on 1983 copper-plated zinc cents. Gas trapped between the zinc core and thin copper plating during the striking process creates these bubbles. They are a known manufacturing characteristic of early zinc cents, not a mint error. Blisters have no numismatic premium and add zero value to the coin.

My 1983 penny has doubling on the letters — is it the FS-801?

It may be Machine Doubling (MD), which is extremely common on 1983 cents and has no value. The key difference: MD doubling is flat, shelf-like, and appears to reduce letter width. The genuine FS-801 doubling is rounded and notched, and it increases letter width — letters in ONE CENT and E PLURIBUS UNUM appear visibly thicker than on a normal coin. Also, the FS-801 is a Philadelphia (no mint mark) coin only.

How rare is the 1983 Bronze Planchet Error compared to the 1943 Copper Cent?

Both are transitional wrong-planchet errors from composition-change years, and both are genuine rarities. The 1983 Bronze error currently trades in the five-figure range ($15,000–$29,000+), while the 1943 Copper cent trades in six to seven figures. Population-wise, only a handful of 1983 Bronze examples are known across both Philadelphia and Denver mints.

Is the 1983-S penny rare? What is it worth?

The 1983-S penny was minted exclusively as a Proof coin for inclusion in annual Proof Sets, with a mintage of 3,279,126. It is not rare in the traditional sense, but it is only available to collectors who purchased the Proof Set. Standard examples grade at PR67–PR69 and are worth approximately $3–$10. No business strikes (regular-finish coins) were made at San Francisco in 1983 — if you have a non-proof-finish 1983-S cent, verify the mint mark carefully.

Should I clean my 1983 penny before sending it to PCGS or NGC?

Never clean any coin you suspect may be valuable. Cleaning — even gentle rinsing — leaves microscopic hairlines on the surface that graders can detect, and a cleaned coin receives a details grade (such as "Cleaned") rather than a numerical grade, drastically reducing its market value. Handle suspected error coins by the edges only and store them in a non-PVC flip or airtight holder until submission.

Are 1983-D RPMs (Repunched Mint Marks) real and valuable?

The attribution of 1983-D RPMs is contested among experts. While Variety Vista lists RPM-001 and RPM-002, major authority John Wexler has historically paused or excluded 1983-D RPMs from his active listings. Additionally, plating blisters near the D mint mark are common and can mimic RPM doubling. Due to this disputed status and the lack of major auction records, 1983-D RPMs are not recommended as investment targets at this time.

Research Methodology & Sources

Pricing data in this guide reflects verified auction records through July 2024, with the key data point being the GreatCollections MS65RD Bronze Planchet sale. The following authoritative sources were used:

Minor variety pricing for WDDO-001/002 is estimated from specialized dealer channels; no major-house auction records exist for these varieties. 1983-D RPM attribution is excluded per conflicting expert guidance. eBay sales are excluded from all pricing models per our methodology.

A note on images: To help illustrate coin diagnostics and rare varieties — especially complex errors that are difficult to describe in text alone — this guide uses AI-generated images. All written values, diagnostics, and variety attributions have been manually reviewed against the cited sources above. While our editorial team works to ensure every image is accurate and helpful, AI-generated illustrations may occasionally misrepresent fine details. If you spot any discrepancy between an image and its written description, please contact us or leave a comment below — we review all feedback and correct errors promptly. Numismatic knowledge is a community effort, and your input helps us build a more accurate resource for everyone.

5/5 - (1 vote)